Being charged with a criminal offence can be confronting, particularly for someone who has never previously been involved with the criminal justice system. Questions often arise immediately: Do I have to speak to police? Will I be released on bail? What happens at the first court hearing? Do I have to enter a plea straight away? Will I receive a criminal conviction?
In Western Australia, the answer depends upon the charge, the circumstances of the alleged offence and the individual accused. However, most criminal matters follow a recognisable process.
Being charged does not mean being found guilty
A criminal charge is an allegation. It is not a finding of guilt.
The prosecution is generally required to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. An accused person is entitled to challenge the prosecution case and, where appropriate, rely upon a defence.
One of the first important steps is therefore to properly identify the charge and understand exactly what the prosecution must prove.
Police interviews and legal advice
A person may become involved in a criminal investigation before actually appearing in court. Police may request an interview, arrest a suspect, conduct searches or undertake other investigative procedures.
The Criminal Investigation Act 2006 (WA) regulates many of the powers exercised by police during criminal investigations.
An arrested suspect has important rights. These include being informed of the offence for which they have been arrested, being cautioned before being interviewed as a suspect and having a reasonable opportunity to communicate with a legal practitioner.
What someone says during the early stages of an investigation can later become important evidence. For that reason, obtaining legal advice before participating in a police interview can be particularly important.
The first court appearance
Once a person has been charged, the prosecution will ordinarily come before a court.
Many criminal matters in Western Australia commence in the Magistrates Court, although more serious indictable offences may ultimately proceed to the District Court or Supreme Court.
The first appearance is not necessarily a trial. Depending upon the case, the court may deal with matters such as bail, the accused person’s plea, obtaining prosecution material, legal representation and the future timetable for the case.
For charges, the Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA) provides procedures designed to ensure that an accused understands the charge and has had an opportunity to consider it and seek legal advice before being required to plead.
There can therefore be good reason not to make an important decision about a plea until the charge and available evidence have been properly considered.
Should I plead guilty or not guilty?
A plea of guilty is an admission of the offence. A plea of not guilty requires the prosecution to prove the charge.
This can be one of the most significant decisions made during criminal proceedings.
The correct plea cannot be determined simply by asking whether an incident occurred. Criminal offences contain particular legal elements which the prosecution must establish. Issues can arise concerning identification, intention, consent, self-defence, the reliability of witnesses, the admissibility of evidence and whether the conduct alleged actually constitutes the particular offence charged.
Before deciding upon a plea, it may therefore be necessary to consider both the prosecution evidence and the applicable law.
Obtaining and examining the prosecution evidence
The prosecution case may include witness statements, police body-worn camera footage, CCTV, photographs, medical evidence, telephone records, text messages, forensic evidence or a recorded police interview.
Disclosure of prosecution material is an important part of criminal proceedings and is dealt with under the Criminal Procedure Act 2004 (WA).
Once the relevant evidence is available, it can be assessed against the elements of the charge.
Sometimes that assessment reveals that the prosecution case is strong. In other cases there may be inconsistencies, evidentiary problems or a factual or legal defence requiring the matter to be contested.
What happens with bail?
If an accused person is arrested, another immediate issue may be whether they will be released on bail.
Bail in Western Australia is governed principally by the Bail Act 1982 (WA). Bail may be granted subject to conditions designed to address concerns arising from the particular circumstances of the case.
Conditions can include restrictions concerning contact with particular people, attendance at particular locations or other conduct.
It is important that bail conditions are understood and followed carefully. If circumstances change and a bail condition becomes impractical, an application may sometimes be made to vary the condition rather than simply ignoring it.
What happens if the charge is defended?
If an accused pleads not guilty, the matter proceeds through the court process towards a hearing or trial.
The prosecution will present evidence in an attempt to prove the charge. Depending upon the nature of the case, witnesses may be cross-examined and evidence may be challenged.
The defence may argue, for example, that an essential element of the offence has not been proved, that a witness is unreliable, that evidence should not be admitted or that a recognised defence applies.
Ultimately, the question for the court is whether the prosecution has proved the charge to the required criminal standard.
If it has not, the accused is entitled to be found not guilty.
What happens after a plea or finding of guilty?
If a person pleads guilty or is found guilty following a hearing or trial, the matter proceeds to sentencing.
Sentencing in Western Australia is principally governed by the Sentencing Act 1995 (WA).
The appropriate sentence depends upon many matters, including the particular offence, the seriousness of the conduct, the person’s circumstances, any prior record, the effect upon any victim, prospects of rehabilitation and other relevant aggravating or mitigating considerations.
The possible outcomes vary considerably depending upon the offence and can range from relatively modest penalties through to imprisonment in serious cases.
A properly prepared sentencing hearing can therefore be an important part of the criminal process.
Why obtaining advice early can matter
Criminal proceedings frequently involve decisions that can have consequences well beyond the next court date.
A criminal matter can potentially affect employment, professional licences, travel, family circumstances and a person’s criminal record.
Early legal advice can help an accused understand the allegation, identify the relevant evidence, make an informed decision about their plea and prepare appropriately for court.
Most importantly, every criminal case is different. The fact that two people have been charged with offences carrying the same description does not mean that their cases, available defences or likely outcomes will necessarily be the same.
Facing a criminal charge in Western Australia
Being charged with an offence can be stressful, but the criminal process is not determined simply by the fact that a charge has been laid.
The evidence must be considered, the applicable law identified and the individual’s circumstances properly understood.
Anyone facing a criminal charge should obtain advice directed to the particular facts of their case before making significant decisions about a police interview, bail, a plea or the future conduct of the proceedings.
This article contains general information about criminal law in Western Australia and is not a substitute for legal advice concerning an individual case.
About the Author
Craig Clifford Bloxham – Barrister & Solicitor
Craig brings an uncommon blend of academic depth, scientific knowledge, and professional training to his criminal law practice. He holds a Bachelor of Laws, a Master of Business Administration, a Postgraduate Diploma in Psychotherapy, and a Postgraduate Diploma in Dispute Resolution. With advanced knowledge across scientific and technical disciplines, Craig is able to interpret and analyse complex evidence, from forensic material to digital data, with precision. This rare combination of legal, psychological, scientific, and strategic expertise enables him to approach each matter with a uniquely multifaceted perspective, offering insights that few practitioners in the field can match.
